SERIOUSLY NOW . . . ARE WE TO BELIEVE THAT “SLEEPY JOE” BIDEN IS TRULY THE DEM’S “CHOSEN ONE”?

Well, as our November 03, 2020 Presidential Election rapidly approaches . . . the radical-left high-jacked Democrat Party’s indisputable front-runner, old “Sleepy Joe” Gaffe-King Biden, just keeps racking up big-time support from his no doubt “deeply proud” base of “Keep-America-From-Ever-Being-Great” Trump-Haters.

While the below list is of course far from all-inclusive, it nonetheless gives one a snap-shot “example” of the mix and nature of heavy-hitters that are (at least publicly) touting Biden as their savior from another Trump and Pence administration:

First, there was the 03/04/2020 reported indorsement of Mini Mike Bloomberg . . . after spending over $1 Billion on his failed campaign that lasted a bit over 100 days;

Next came Crazy Bernie Sanders’ 04/13/2020 reported indorsement . . . after “once again” being forced to drop out of the race, along with his “even-too-radical-for-the-radical-left” democratic-socialist/communist ideology;

Followed by the 04/14/2020 reported indorsement of our country’s Worst Transform-America Nightmare, Past President Barack Hussein Obama . . . after waiting some 355 days to extend his personal blessing to his former VP of eight years;

Swiftly followed by the 04/15/2020 reported indorsement of Hyper-Arm-Waving, Once-A-Front-Runner-Also, Elizabeth Warren . . . after dropping out of the race on 03/05/2020 and spending some time “pondering her options”;

And, not to be out-done by others, there was that 04/27/2020 reported indorsement of Nervous, Impeach-Trump Gold Pens, Nancy Pelosi . . . in which, with a straight face, she publicly touted Biden’s “character, values, experience, and strategic thinking”;

AND THEN . . . along came Clinton!!! Yes, even old Crooked, Corruption-Incarnate, Sore-Loser, Forever Trump Hater, Hillary Clinton has also added her 04/28/2020 reported indorsement of Biden . . . during a virtual “Women’s Town Hall” on how women were responding to the COVID pandemic; saying she wanted to add her voice to “the many who have endorsed” Biden.

Yep, “for sure,” the radical-left high-jacked Dems are definitely uniting behind the “so-far” reaper-of-the-democrat-campaign-spoils . . . old Sleepy Joe Biden!

However, what is NOT yet “for sure” (at least publicly so) . . . is who will ACTUALLY wind up being the Dem’s “for real” pick-of-the-litter “serious” opponents against Trump and Pence come November 03, 2020? That is, who is “The Swamp’s” truly chosen one? The “Deep State’s” status-quo insurance policy?

Yes, and borrowing a line in part from famous radio broadcaster, Paul Harvey (1918-2009) . . . the “Rest of the Story” is obviously yet to be revealed!
                                                             —William James Moore

The "Origin" of Community-Deteriorating "Consequences"?

The Parsons Sun is a longstanding local newspaper located in and published from Parsons, Kansas. The city of Parsons (population, about 10,000)—located in Labette County (population, about 20,000)—is located in southeast Kansas (a state of approximately 2.9 million). That Kansas has a prolonged declining population, now ranking 36th among U.S. states and territories, is of course the “consequence” of something(s).

On a related note—the Weekend, Saturday-Sunday, April 11-12, 2020 edition of the Sun included a font-page article titled in part, “CSO settles in, helps teach public about city ordinances.” A comprehensive reporting boasting recent addition of a newly created Community Service Officer (CSO) position within the Parsons Police Department. 

Reportedly, in addition to animal control and other applicable duties, this new position will—after police academy training—also provide back-up support to other officers, etc. As highlighted within the article, the first applicant hired to fill this new CSO position, has background including, but not limited to, some 18 years of experience with the San Antonio, Texas Police Department.

Unquestionably, and respectfully so, the Texas applicant’s acceptance for this newly created position in Parsons, Kansas is no doubt the “consequence of” meeting or exceeding the applicable recruitment criteria. As the newly created CSO Position is in kind the “consequence of” the Parsons Police Department’s creative and continuing efforts to best serve the community. Achievements warranting, on the part of the Parsons community—due recognition, cooperation, and support to all concerned parties, along with best wishes for every success in this and other community service aims. 

Nevertheless—much warranted also is a Parsons community that will hopefully commit to finding ways and means to identify and responsibly address the “origin” of “other relevant consequences.” 

For example, in spite of the best efforts of the local Parsons, Kansas educational institutions, business enterprises, city government, and community in general to educate, train, and retain local human resources . . . what is the “origin” of the “consequences” that at times deems it necessary to recruit beyond the Parsons community, when seeking to fill Dispatcher; Community Service Officer; and other meaningful work within the City of Parsons employment rolls?

Clearly, it is the “consequence” of something(s)—and should likely be a bit beyond unsettling that—apparently there are times when recruitment efforts find no qualified natives/residents of Parsons, Labette County, or for that matter, within the some 2.9 million population of the State of Kansas, interested in available meaningful work? A state that, for example, at the time this new CSO position was filled, had an unemployment rate of well beyond 3 percent? Meaningful work that was however, of interest to a determined suitably qualified applicant from San Antonio, Texas. 

Thereby evidencing what seems to be as a minimum—a most sad, undesirable, and otherwise community discouraging reality. And, as Parsons, Kansas, and a growing number of other “less populated areas” across the country, keep losing crucial human resources, it would appear especially important, if not critical, that such impacted communities strive much harder and wiser to identify, and responsibly address, the “origin” of “community-deteriorating consequences”—one and all. 

Otherwise, and most unfortunately so, many more such communities will likely one day soon cease to exist within the U.S. landscape—along with the less-hectic, in touch with nature, and otherwise more down-to-earth life style, many justifiably argue the U.S. needs much more of. One which once lost, will likely not be regained, nor ever again experienced by countless within future generations of Americans. 

                                                              —William James Moore